It does look cool. And would make for a great box, i would urge you to try and finish this up and play around with the front more.
Right now its just this link
The ending result is nice, but I'd agree with Deividas that further experimentation wouldn't be ill-advised. Trying your hand at backs more often could also serve not only as a sign of effort, but a test of creativity.
@Hunter I really couldn't disagree more.The front doesn't always need a logo. Several of my favorite boxes on the site don't have logos on the front. I would understand that mind frame if it were a traditional box that you would see in a store, but this box obviously isn't that.
@slimd1995 I could easily see this cover being in a store. I understand that the front is already crowded but a shortened version of the logo would do just fine and add to the presentation.
@deividas
yes i'll do for every simple one but when i have time now i post what i did in the past
@ the rest
not every cover has a logo and minimal design has different basics not one standard,most of the special edition boxes are way 2 simple,others don't even have a title just the presentation,before you criticize something look at the originals and not 1,2,3 ...the whole big history.I do minimal stock composition for 7 years and i know very well the esthetics.Thanks everyone who views my box arts such as simple or complex,for real and good criticism,opinions etc.Thanks i'll be back with more complex soon ,hope that i'll have the time.Cheers!
It does look cool. And would make for a great box, i would urge you to try and finish this up and play around with the front more.
Right now its just this link
[ Reply ]
The ending result is nice, but I'd agree with Deividas that further experimentation wouldn't be ill-advised. Trying your hand at backs more often could also serve not only as a sign of effort, but a test of creativity.
[ Reply ]
It needs a logo.
[ Reply ]
What? It has one on the spine, that's more than enough.
[ Reply ]
@Reed I disagree, the front should always have a logo.
The spine's logo is too big so i suggest shrinking it, otherwise i like it.
A back is definitely needed and if you can't do it then please drop by the WIP section and our folks will help you out. :D
[ Reply ]
@Hunter I really couldn't disagree more.The front doesn't always need a logo. Several of my favorite boxes on the site don't have logos on the front. I would understand that mind frame if it were a traditional box that you would see in a store, but this box obviously isn't that.
[ Reply ]
@slimd1995 I could easily see this cover being in a store. I understand that the front is already crowded but a shortened version of the logo would do just fine and add to the presentation.
[ Reply ]
@deividas
yes i'll do for every simple one but when i have time now i post what i did in the past
@ the rest
not every cover has a logo and minimal design has different basics not one standard,most of the special edition boxes are way 2 simple,others don't even have a title just the presentation,before you criticize something look at the originals and not 1,2,3 ...the whole big history.I do minimal stock composition for 7 years and i know very well the esthetics.Thanks everyone who views my box arts such as simple or complex,for real and good criticism,opinions etc.Thanks i'll be back with more complex soon ,hope that i'll have the time.Cheers!
[ Reply ]