game PlayStation 3 » Grand Theft Auto 5 Box Cover
views 2,281   favorites 19 (?)  


Grand Theft Auto 5 box art cover
By avatar szejkxx 25 on December 30th, 2013

My vision of GTAV cover.

comments Grand Theft Auto 5 Box Cover Comments


Comment on szejkxx's Grand Theft Auto 5 Box Art / Cover.

avatar
PEYMAN 36 [ 6 years ago ]

creative job
well done

[ Reply ]


avatar
BenBrownDesign 42 [ 6 years ago ]

The front is well worked and I admire that you've gone for a completely different colour-scheme.

The back is really poor in contrast to the front though as you've chosen to do your copywriting in, arguably, one of the worst fonts ever. Always look what official fonts are being used for things and make sure it's something that's easily readable like Helvetica, Arial or Tahoma, your standard Sans Serif * fonts.

Some more game screenshots on the back that are different to the images you've already used on the front would be perfect too and would really bring the cover to life and give it more character.

Watch about re-colouring official logos, also. It looks as if you have a yellow-ish tint on the front PEGI 18 logo, as well as the logos on the back. Make sure official stuff like that is always above everything else on your layer palette, or at least not covered by a major colour.

( * For those that don't know, 'Sans Serif' refers to fonts that don't have little flicks or lines on the edges of letters such as Times New Roman, a 'Serif' font. The flicks and lines are called serifs, and 'sans' is a friend word meaning 'without' - so you can easily remember that fonts like Helvetica, Arial and Tahoma are without flicks and lines. )

[ Reply ]

avatar
BenBrownDesign 42 [ 6 years ago ]

* French word, sorry. Not friend.

[ Reply ]


avatar
Moebius 38 [ 6 years ago ]

Not a bad box, nice idea.

[ Reply ]


avatar
LOoOP 39 [ 6 years ago ]

Nice dood disign

[ Reply ]


avatar
Vince_1990 46 [ 6 years ago ]

Very creative and very different style for GTA. Great job!

[ Reply ]


avatar
Heart Breaker 43 [ 5 years ago ]

NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICE

[ Reply ]