game Nintendo DS » Katamari Ds Box Cover
views 4,668   favorites 0  


Katamari Ds box cover
By avatar finalfantaseer22 43 on December 26th, 2006
print No Printable Available

comments Katamari Ds Box Cover Comments


Comment on finalfantaseer22's Katamari Ds Box Art / Cover.

avatar
finalfantaseer22 43 [ 1 decade ago ]

just for fun.
hadazawari means "touch" in japanese so i thought it would be perfect.

[ Reply ]


avatar
DeathSpawn11 47 [ 1 decade ago ]

cool box but it's kinda plain 3.5/5

[ Reply ]


avatar
lord_arcanus 20 [ 1 decade ago ]

quite nice actually.

4/5

[ Reply ]


avatar
Brettska99 45 [ 1 decade ago ]

Its the offical katamari 1 box with a ds template but i love all the improvements on it so i'll give u 3.5/5

[ Reply ]


avatar
finalfantaseer22 43 [ 1 decade ago ]

yeah well whats wrong with it?
its just for fun.

you of all people...

[ Reply ]


avatar
finalfantaseer22 43 [ 1 decade ago ]

#2, i dont see how its plain.
all the katamari boxes are plain.
i mean, you could tell me what to add to make it less plain, but then you might start saying "its too cluttered"
...

[ Reply ]


avatar
Radioactive Bob 38 [ 1 decade ago ]

#6, i don't think DeathSpawn has ever even seen a Katamari box. :P
Let alone play one (which explains your dislike of the game.)
All Katamari boxes are plain, even more so than this. So i'd say it's about a 4/5. Nice name too ;)

[ Reply ]


avatar
finalfantaseer22 43 [ 1 decade ago ]

#7, thank you potato-lover

[ Reply ]


avatar
Radioactive Bob 38 [ 1 decade ago ]

#8, I mention potatoes one too many times, and now i'm the "potato god". Whether that's good or not, i've yet to find out. =/

[ Reply ]


avatar
finalfantaseer22 43 [ 1 decade ago ]

#9, wellll...
its GOD + POTATOES.
that should be good, right?

[ Reply ]


avatar
jacobs06 1 [ 1 decade ago ]

i wouldnt say its plain...its just simple. and simple doesnt mean bad.

[ Reply ]


avatar
Deathclock 3 [ 1 decade ago ]

its good, but its almost exactly like the katamari damacy(damashi, whatever) but i like it: 4.5/5

[ Reply ]