[ view full size ]
Version 1 added on 10/24/06 by treesquirrel12
Favorite this Author (must be logged in to use)
, Comments
(0) » REPLY «#2. Radioactive Bob 
@ 4:21PM 10/24/06
[re: v1] | Well, the slogan makes the box seem a little...bad... but everyhing else is great. i'd say a 4.5/5, just for god sake PLEASE change the slogan 0.o |
(0) » REPLY «#3. E_G 
@ 4:29PM 10/24/06
[re: v1] | Are the XBOX banners really like that in the US? link And ''now git going right now'' bit sounds really dopey but great work. |
(0) » REPLY «#4. treesquirrel12 @ 4:32PM 10/24/06
[re: v1] | #3, im not sure but i got it off those temps kracker posted cred to him for it |
(0) » REPLY «#5. crazypun88 
@ 4:44PM 10/24/06
[re: v1] | its not bad, but there are some things that could be improved on: 1. on the front erase part of the image (the one on top of stranger) so that that image doesnt cover on top of stranger. 2. fade that image so its faded properly into the clouds/background 3. the text that is placed on the back is covering other text. you should either remove your text and leave the other one, or erase the text in there and place the text u have in the same format 4. the xbox template is wrong, but thats really no biggie, just letting you no if u fix thos things, itll be 5/5, but rite now, its 3/5 |
(0) » REPLY «#6. E_G @ 5:22PM 10/24/06
[re: v1] | #5, That underneath text is'nt exackly text, its an image of a wanted poster, the glow helps distinguish what the real text is. The large amount of images make it less boring and if he faded things more into the clouds, it'll be too faded like a gimmick, 3/5 is harsh. The incorrect template and too-goofy summary on the back are the only true problems. |
(0) » REPLY «#7. crazypun88 @ 5:42PM 10/24/06
[re: v1] | #6, i understand that its not text, what im trying to say is taht puting the text that treesquirrel put on top of the text thats already in the picture doesnt really look that good. It would look better if he erased the text in the picture and replaced it with his text. Just a suggestion, thought it wud make the back look better. but i still stick with with my 3/5 vote, because it can still be improved. |
(0) » REPLY «#8. E_G @ 6:11PM 10/24/06
[re: v1] | #7, Its true it can be improved thats why I rated it a 4 but it would look kind of shitty if the artist tried to destroy the writing on the poster, it would lose a lot of detail and it'll be very hard to read for a start. The poster back works well, accounting there is more than one poster and the writing on it is really small, so nothing clashes. Anyone can tell at first glance which bit is supposed to be which. |
[re: v1]