game PC » World of Warcraft: The Emerald Dream Box Cover
views 6,402   favorites 1 (?)  


World of Warcraft: The Emerald Dream box art cover
By avatar Frezno 1 on January 8th, 2011
print No Printable Available

comments World of Warcraft: The Emerald Dream Box Cover Comments


Comment on Frezno's World of Warcraft: The Emerald Dream Box Art / Cover.

avatar
Frezno 1 [ 9 years ago ]

This is my first box so please don't be to harsh, I spent alot of time on it and I would appreciate constructive criticism so I can make it better, thanks :)

[ Reply ]


avatar
RoarShark 40 [ 9 years ago ]

For a first, this is quite nice. You seem to have the basics down. The front looks pretty official, so basically there is nothing wrong there. The back is ok, but its not real appealing to me (just an opinion.)

[ Reply ]


avatar
Frezno 1 [ 9 years ago ]

#2, Thank you :) Yeah the front I spent the most time on, trying to make the logo look nice and stuff

[ Reply ]


avatar
prince_xedar 1 [ 9 years ago ]

im not that great a box artist atm but in this one i would put ysera on the back, for two reasons. One, She is the dragon aspect of the Emerald Dream and has relavence to the game and second to get a focal point on the back, at the moment its just bland and has no central focus point like the front does

[ Reply ]


avatar
KoopaDasher 30 [ 9 years ago ]

There's a lot of really great stuff here, dude. Much better than my first. You certainly have the basics down. Technically, everything is here, and you've done it all well. The only thing you're really missing is a design for the back. It feels like you weren't really sure what to do for the back, and just stuck things there. If you had a cohesive, organized design, it would be so much better. But you've got it in you. A bit more practice, and you'll be great.

[ Reply ]


avatar
Frezno 1 [ 9 years ago ]

#5, Thanks dude :) Yeah the back I was stuck on, I didn't really know what to put on it or what to make it look like or how I should organize it so I just kinda put stuff there.

[ Reply ]