music Music » Nine Inch Nails - The Fragile Cover
views 3,714   favorites 5 (?)  


Nine Inch Nails - The Fragile box art cover
By avatar vidboy10 34 on July 1st, 2009
print No Printable Available

comments Nine Inch Nails - The Fragile Cover Comments


Comment on vidboy10's Nine Inch Nails - The Fragile Cover.

avatar
vidboy10 34 [ 1 decade ago ]

I really wanted to make a box for this album because the offcial is HORRIBLE. Here, even have a look for yourselves link

And Before you say this box is not that great Please look at these.
link
link
I tried to combine these two together. (Except the red line thing On TDTWWA)

[ Reply ]


avatar
RoarShark 40 [ 1 decade ago ]

#1, Yep looks pretty darn good for a Nine Inch Nails cover, since most of them are weird, you sir have earn a fave.

[ Reply ]


avatar
Ray Blade 40 [ 1 decade ago ]

Like I said on AIM, it's pretty official looking! And far beyond the standards of a traditional NIN cover.

[ Reply ]


avatar
gmrtom7 3 [ 1 decade ago ]

Yeah, I really have to wonder who does NIN covers, because a lot of them really suck.

[ Reply ]


avatar
Sven 32 [ 1 decade ago ]

I like most of Nine Inch Nails' official covers...this is quite good.

[ Reply ]


avatar
AfterShock 14 [ 1 decade ago ]

#4, I disagree. I really like some of their artwork.

Anyway, nice work on this!

[ Reply ]


avatar
HalfSwiss 43 [ 1 decade ago ]

NIN makes great covers, especially The Slip.

I don't like how you added Halo 14 and 23 tracks to the front.

Edited at 1 decade ago

[ Reply ]


avatar
vidboy10 34 [ 1 decade ago ]

#7, Its there because it's suposed to be like TDTWWA's thing on the front.

But thanks for the comments and Favs guys!

[ Reply ]


avatar
milkyoreo27 25 [ 1 decade ago ]

Its alright.. the front is pretty good, but I dislike the text in white. The back is good too, but for Right side #6, dude, watch the language. They're kids on this site.

[ Reply ]


avatar
vidboy10 34 [ 1 decade ago ]

Whoa whoa whoa WHOA.
How did i lose so many favs?
But thanks milky for the constructive criticism.

[ Reply ]