
Need For Speed: Getting Desperate Box Cover Comments
Comment on Vekta101's Need For Speed: Getting Desperate Box Art / Cover.
Comment on Vekta101's Need For Speed: Getting Desperate Box Art / Cover.
Yeh yeh, hurry up and make your "Vekta's Jokes: Getting Desperate" joke.
This is just a play on the title, the "Getting Desperate" part is just referring to how he is so desperate for speed he's trading a camera for it.
[ Reply ]
How do u come up with these ideas? Its genius.
[ Reply ]
Well thanks, but I don't consider them genius.
[ Reply ]
luvit
[ Reply ]
man y pee ess tree???? da pee ess tree sukzzzz mor leik da pee ess gai LOL
[ Reply ]
Did someone let you out of your cage a little early?
[ Reply ]
No, I was just, y'know, portraying the man you envision me to be: an uneducated PS3-bashing buffoon.
[ Reply ]
lmao
[ Reply ]
And you base this on what?
[ Reply ]
LAWL !!
[ Reply ]
"Of course, trust a person who doesn't own a PS3 to know what the best games are. What a fanboy."
"I actually made the first Frontlines box, but I guess you just aren't aware of anything happening outside of your precious 360."
And my personal favorite...
(after I said that the 360 was the shooter's console) "That was the most ignorant comment I've ever heard."
[ Reply ]
You were going on about what you believed to be the best PS3 games when you don't even have one.
You claimed you made the first Frontlines box, when it was in fact me. I made a PS3 one and you made a 360 one.
By saying that (some game) should be a 360 exclusive because 360 has a lot of shooters you are just screaming "I love 360".
I think my portrayal is pretty just.
[ Reply ]
I've played the PS3 enough to know which games are good for it, and I've read enough about its games that I think I can make a rough estimate about which games would be good for that person to get.
Okay... All you had to do was tell me that you actually made the first one.
It is a FACT that the 360 is the best console for shooters.
[ Reply ]
#13, It's not a fact, it's an opinion and I think you should stop trying to bait Vetka. That doesn't make you better.
Edited at 1 decade ago
[ Reply ]
Do you know what speed is?
Oh, and as far as the fact/opinion thing goes... It is a fact, because every shooter that is released on multiple platforms gets a better score on the 360.
[ Reply ]
I'm no fanboy. But I do know that the PS3 is more powerful than the 360 when it comes to stats: graphics, memory, yadiyadiyada. So, Theorically the PS3 is potentially capable of producing better looking, (notice I didn't say gameplay) games. That is undisputable, cause more graphics power=better graphics.
However, the 360 would be the best console for shooters CURRENTLY....due to a better controller layout for shooters. (the layout of the left and right analog sticks is better suited for shooters than the dual shock symmetrical layout) Not only that, Xbox live has a much larger base when it comes to the number of gamers online when compared to sony or nintendo. So, it's only natural that people believe that the 360 is the best console for shooters, that doesn't necesarily mean it will stay like that for good.
That's my personal opinion on this. No fanboyism whatsoever, I've said both good and bad sides of 360 and PS3. So, it's up to ppl to decide which they would get, hopefully without influence of fanboyish comments. So, enough of this ps3 vs. 360 mudslinging....both systems have great games respectively in their own merits. no fanboyism needed. nuff said.
[ Reply ]
hahahahahah omg soo freaking funny
[ Reply ]
Reading about games is the same as playing them now is it?
Considering when you added the box the title "Frontlines: Fuel of War" was already there, it's pretty safe to assume that one was already made.
It is not a fact, you prefer your shooters on the 360 so lets leave it at that.
The only reason a multiplatform game gets a score lower on one console is either A) Bias reviewers or B) The game is lazily ported so it is missing certain features or the graphics are downgraded.
I myself cannot stand the 360's controller, The d-pad is horrible, might as well just be a giant circle. I hate the non-symmetrical layout of the sticks. The only thing I like about it is the handles.
Your supposed facts are completely baseless and have been met.
[ Reply ]
I agree with the fact that both consoles have pros and cons, but I mean, c'mon... There's been one good PS3-exclusive shooter, and that was Resistance.
[ Reply ]
#18, XDDDD
You've lost all credibility with me now because of your comment about "biased reviewers". That idea is completely ludicrous.
[ Reply ]
#20 Gamespot FTW?
#19 And there's been one good 360 exclusive shooter and that is Halo 3 (GOW doesn't count as it's third person and more action orientated).
Haze and Killzone 2 are coming out soon, both of which look amazing.
[ Reply ]
#19, thank you ;) I'm glad you understand what I'm trying to say. Let's not be fanboys either guys and give the ps3 a chance too when it comes to shooters. And don't be bias: more than likely there'll be more to come after resistance :) even a 360 owner can't deny that the ps3 does indeed have great potential when it comes to getting great exclusive shooters.
[ Reply ]
This is true. I am looking forward to seeing how both those games do. And you're right about GameSpot... I hate that site...
Gears is still a shooter, though. It's just not an FPS. It's lacking the key elements of an action game, which is why it isn't categorized as such.
Again, console-wise, the 360 has Prey, BioShock, Condemned (more first person survival horror, but there's shooting), Lost Planet, GRAW, and the Orange Box. (I know, LP and OB are coming out on the PS3, but they're not out yet.)
[ Reply ]
#23, Lost Planet sucks.
[ Reply ]
totally, absolutely, hilarious
[ Reply ]
The box is too thick
[ Reply ]