We sloud have something when we can look at pepole who votes your boxes. These really unfair votes are geting out of hand . Some one give my MGS boxart a 1 and no tell why ?
What do you think ?
We sloud have something when we can look at pepole who votes your boxes. These really unfair votes are geting out of hand . Some one give my MGS boxart a 1 and no tell why ?
What do you think ?
Last edited by Ratchetcomand; 10-20-2006 at 10:45 AM.
I said this before, other members said this before....but I think it's not going to happen if only an couple people want it change...Originally Posted by Ratchetcomand
Also you talk to REED about it, since he's the only one that can change it.![]()
i think it would be fair to allow that.
i mean, the people who know that retaliation votes will get then banned won't do it, right? and if Reed knows that, whats stopping him from making peoples ratings public?
i dunno...thats just how i see it...
I don't mind making my Ratings public, I say what they are anyway but sometimes I like to keep it private too; theres that thing at moment where typical users are getting upset about getting typical scores like 3s when thats a good score and I can just imagine people doing their rating huntings, to see who gave what box what and they'll be loads of grudges because some one wanted a 4.5 instead of a normal 3 as silly as it sounds. There are grudges now just imagine how many grudges there be if the votes were'nt private.![]()
I do see a lot of sense in why people's votes are private.
Seeing as how people have a tendancy to over rate boxes as of late and sometimes even under rate them, i think the rating systems should be axed. I say just leave the comments so that way people can leave their praise and/or critiques.
I've stopped rating boxes altogether. Personally i'm getting tired of people complaining about the scores they get. Seriously, what kind of egotist needs to have a numerical score next to their boxes?
[/rant]
^_^d
actually, you have a really good point there...Originally Posted by Gunslinger
the only reason i get pissed when people underrate my boxes, is because i put more effort into them than they could imagine, and they just find one little thing to cut the score for, and i think it's bullshit.
not to mention those ball-less bastards that dont even say why they couldn't give it a 5. [/rant]![]()
there really would be a lot less bitching if we just got rid of the rating system but then there goes part of the site, you know?
i dunno...i'm kinda 50/50 on the whole thing...
My heart agrees with youOriginally Posted by Gunslinger
![]()
But there is'nt more worse than getting up to see one of your own-made boxes average below 3 because you did'nt notice there was something that would really peeve everyone off, or vice versa with great boxes its more pressurizing and less care-free with the rating system. Back in the day people would just say 'it sucks' or 'its good' or 'its the best' and it was a welcoming, nicer, attitude most people got because there was never a number telling you, you sucked and it was brief.
I do see the big entertaining and competition aspect of the rating system though.
You guys are right. Its what you think. But i think of the ratings as a way for you to see what people thik and if its a 5, Great. If its whatI get 1.83, I ignore it and try to improve. I always say what I post cause it gives the author a general idea on how to please the public. a skill i have yet to achive.